Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150924
Uptime40.2 Days
Run DateJun 22 '18 at 19:31
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 371
47% 357 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.57
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 45
Parallax 40.3
39% 44.4 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 36.4
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 393
Mixed 405
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 37.4
161% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 106
116% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Inte SSDSA2CW120G3 120GB
1GB free
Firmware: 4PC1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 261
Write 134
Mixed 173
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 14.9
70% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 55.2
DQ Mixed 21.6
37% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 155
Mixed 152
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.22
85% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 114%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
7GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 87.2
Write 79.1
Mixed 72.9
60% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.25
83% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%
WD WD5000KS-00MNB0 500GB
3GB free
Firmware: 07.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 43.9
Mixed 41
32% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.64 MB/s
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 41.4
Write 8.71
Mixed 15.9
22% 22 MB/s
4K Read 6.12
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.08
33% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $752
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback