Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '18 at 15:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 97.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 517
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 32
Parallax 32
22% 30.1 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 35
25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 504
Mixed 516
115% 515 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 14.6
94% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 14.6
79% 177 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 182%
Silicon Power Blaze B10 USB 3.0 16GB-$20
0GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 22.3
Mixed 20.6
29% 24 MB/s
4K Read 5.17
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.34
42% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 46.7
86% 46.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback