Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '18 at 07:31
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 118
2-Core 204
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 610
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 18
Parallax 28.2
17% 22.4 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 21.3
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 467
Write 168
Mixed 214
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 7.53
60% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 22.8
34% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 82%
Fujitsu MHV2080BH PL 80GB
41GB free
Firmware: 00000029 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 32
Mixed 30.8
24% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.26
65% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
8.03% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 9.63
Mixed 8.05
16% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
26% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.03%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 29.5
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 26.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac - $142

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback