HP Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardWistron 30D6
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '18 at 23:42
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Socket A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
Memory 49.3
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 54.1
30% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 50.4
8-Core 48.7
7% 49.6 Pts
64-Core 52.8
3% 52.8 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB-$30
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBFOC32P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 50.8
Mixed 7.37
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.27
64% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.95% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback