Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '18 at 19:00
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 726
67% 560 Pts
64-Core 1,005
62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2512 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 150
Parallax 135
110% 139 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 132
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
449GB free
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 252
Write 173
Mixed 177
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 25.8
109% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 46.3
64% 120 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 255
Write 173
Mixed 174
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 20
112% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 44.2
64% 121 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
870GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 148
Write 117
Mixed 126
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.24
110% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
247GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 155
Mixed 145
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.27
98% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
225GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 95
Write 87.8
Mixed 82
66% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.15
63% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
113GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 101
Write 115
Mixed 111
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.26
83% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-P 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 37.4
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback