HP 550-150no

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 550-150no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 121
51% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 184
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B53) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 7.12
Parallax 7.62
4% 6.64 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 5.91
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 508
Write 156
Mixed 233
65% 299 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 14.6
108% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 14.4
34% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 196
Mixed 180
142% 188 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
810GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 80.5
124% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698651-154-MCN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback