Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '18 at 18:36
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 150 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 495 47% 390 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Above average	Lighting 76.2 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 63.9 62% 71.7 fps	MRender 68.4 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 68 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2989 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 313 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 63 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24510670758	97.4% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 397 Mixed 413 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 41 147% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 77.4 83% 140 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 133%
Corsair CSSD-F240GB2-A 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 18GB free Firmware: 2.4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3910501 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -76072460734369 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2107 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 114 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 41 2687006 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3910501 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15168 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10496 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10496 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9152	40.8% Average	Read 230 Write 79.6 Mixed 125 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 15.7 72% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 96.9 DQ Mixed 39.6 50% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 51%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 18GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2519054 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -38147899509921 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1584 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 897 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2519054 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2519054 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2519054 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10820 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9147 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9147 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13527	44% Average	Read 195 Write 113 Mixed 134 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 12.3 84% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 25.4 44% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 18GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6581 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 992 (B1) Unknown 98 98 35 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 52 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 99 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8868410746	99.1% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 396 Mixed 417 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 39.9 149% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 85.7 93% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 785GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 49193376 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 505 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 52048975 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4386 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 503 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 571867170 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18192 (C2) HDA temperature 34 40 81604378658 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -30764850737246 (F1) Unknown 100 253 18891623448 (F2) Unknown 100 253 141565929032	80.7% Excellent	Read 149 Write 131 Mixed 163 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 5.29 4K Mixed 0.49 172% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 40,596 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.3% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	565x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $606

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16