Asus G752VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G752VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G752VT
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '18 at 18:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 145
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 538
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1CED) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 41
Parallax 37.2
35% 40.4 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 36.4
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra II 1TB
659GB free
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 481
Write 331
Mixed 386
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 23.5
88% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 60.1
65% 101 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 109%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV128 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 719
Write 130
Mixed 205
76% 351 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 15.9
120% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 15.2
56% 125 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH M471A1K43BB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.3
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G752VT Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Asus G752VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback