Lenovo 20J7S25R00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20J7S25R00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20J7S25R00
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJun 18 '18 at 12:54
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 122
42% 262 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 505E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8554
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 12.2
3% 6.19 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 8.87
7% 8.59 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,465
Write 1,348
Mixed 1,534
324% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 45.2
195% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 58.5
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 97.3
79% 107 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 205%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback