Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '18 at 02:52
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$201 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 179 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 461 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Lighting 5.03 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.84 4% 4.79 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.09 4% 5.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24728 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 334 (AB) Unknown 100 100 80804688 (AE) Unknown 100 100 105 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 396 (D2) Unknown 100 100 1 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 87 87 87 (F1) Unknown 100 100 16775 (F2) Unknown 100 100 15114 (F9) Unknown 100 100 762852249	41.3% Average	Read 196 Write 210 Mixed 182 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 13.4 62% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 15.2 DQ Write 85.8 DQ Mixed 15.5 22% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 595GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1332 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 68 8896 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6792 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 40650 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1238 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 50 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 55 193274118170 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 24 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6818	73.5% Very good	Read 126 Write 131 Mixed 120 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.47 119% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 75%
ST4000DM 001-1FK17N 4TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 24.2 Write 25.3 Mixed 4.5 21% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 5.03 4K Mixed 0.33 185% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 75%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 28.2 Write 24.5 Mixed 26.2 33% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 4.11 4K Mixed 0.36 154% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 84%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 28.6 Write 21.5 Mixed 23.9 31% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.33 4K Write 4.08 4K Mixed 0.37 156% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 70%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 920GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 26 Mixed 24.6 34% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.22 73% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 3x4GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	51x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	46x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	42x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	24x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	5x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16