Asus X99-A

Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A (all builds)
Memory	89.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '18 at 18:42
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 90.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 271 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 1,070 96% 808 Pts	64-Core 1441 89% 1441 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% HP(103C 82E5) ≥ 4GB; GTX 1080 Founders Edition CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 159 Parallax 150 119% 152 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 143 Splatting 116 103% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 3TB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 171 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 47 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 64 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 226904	99.4% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 408 Mixed 414 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 41.7 156% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 42.2 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 118 97% 132 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 132%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 171 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 47 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 615125598	67.7% Good	Read 484 Write 262 Mixed 272 75% 339 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 16.6 104% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 39.9 DQ Write 54.2 DQ Mixed 16.3 21% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 3TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2568 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 338 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 49 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4723507852	105% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 395 Mixed 409 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 41.4 154% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 129 143% 244 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 3TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2491 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 330 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 52 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2592216406	103% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 396 Mixed 409 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 37.2 149% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 24.5 89% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 288GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 2,302 Write 1,451 Mixed 1,433 382% 1,728 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 29.3 144% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 121 121% 196 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 283%
JMicron H/W RAID0 10TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 7.5TB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.7% Excellent	Read 216 Write 175 Mixed 126 209% 173 MB/s	4K Read 8.15 4K Write 5.29 4K Mixed 0.37 223% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 6x16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 6 of 8 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	140% Outstanding	MC Read 54.7 MC Write 59.7 MC Mixed 53.9 160% 56.1 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 22.6 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	1,242x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	327x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	144x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	175x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	86x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	32x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16