HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory29.7 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 08:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 69
2-Core 136
56% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 550
49% 413 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V5900 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 2B06) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C4005T3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1,162
Write 770
Mixed 847
205% 926 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 10.5
57% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 5.98
8% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 111%
Great: 159%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 176
Mixed 159
127% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.24
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.37
140% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 23.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback