Cybertan Dibbler

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemCybertan Dibbler  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Dibbler
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 03:20
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: ZE1807C3T4MFB_37/33_Y
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 210
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 490
51% 411 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 26.3
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 20.7
16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston TA2832 31GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 42
Write 39
Mixed 20.2
8% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 3.78
34% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.5
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 4.05
7% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 30.9
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 26.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback