HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 00:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 377
51% 378 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 29.9
21% 28.9 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 34.1
25% 29.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 106
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.58
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%
WD WD20EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
14GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 72.8
Write 74.4
Mixed 68.8
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G6M1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback