Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A2
Memory	28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160726
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 00:06
Run Duration	425 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 1,287 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 117 2-Core 236 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 576 60% 480 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.1% Poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 37.2 Parallax 36.3 18% 31.7 fps	MRender 49.4 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 38.7 34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HMJP-00000 1TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 238GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3590 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 399 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 41 (AE) Unknown 99 99 54 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 3217 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 60 34 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 16203993 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9346 (F2) Unknown 99 99 5579 (F9) Unknown 99 99 42912	103% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 492 Mixed 502 112% 502 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 27.7 127% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 26.7 104% 229 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 125%
WD 6400AAK External 640GB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 60GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 36.9 Write 39.3 Mixed 37 49% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.35 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 22%
TDKMedia Trans-It Drive 8GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 0213 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	5.96% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 8.42 Mixed 1.56 9% 9.37 MB/s	4K Read 6.13 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.02 24% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.96% Great: 10%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.48% Terrible	Read 18 Write 7.33 Mixed 9.63 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.49 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.03 43% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.48% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC 4x8GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	99.4% Outstanding	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 50.6 MC Mixed 34.8 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 19.2 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M740B Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740B

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	14x
Xeon E5-1630 v4IntelBench 80%, 1,287 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	11x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	7x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	4x
MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 86%, 673 samples	4x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	3x

RAM
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 124 samples	7x
M393A1G43EB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 105%, 146 samples	6x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $44Bench 71%, 7,248 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16