Asus GD30CI

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus GD30CI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GD30CI
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170413
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '18 at 23:32
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 128 2-Core 245 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 703 73% 586 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.23 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.9% Very good	Lighting 93 Reflection 106 Parallax 89.6 76% 96.1 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 88.2 Splatting 94.5 76% 92.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 54 (64) Unknown 100 100 83366 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 98 98 22 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 253 253 0 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 2 (B2) Unknown 100 100 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 107 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2533 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 0 73017393185 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 87 1 2823 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 283 (F1) Unknown 100 100 158 (F2) Unknown 100 100 153 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 141306	67% Good	Read 511 Write 124 Mixed 195 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 14.8 101% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 14.3 65% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 913GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 65 61356941 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 95 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 66517 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 58 605093924 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 95 (C2) HDA temperature 36 15 64424509476 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 6 61356941 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -87905095647222 (F1) Unknown 100 253 46129614 (F2) Unknown 100 253 15227327	108% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 184 Mixed 150 131% 176 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.31 104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2TB free, PID 427a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 40.9 Write 41.7 Mixed 11.5 38% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.22 81% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 22 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GD30CI Builds (Compare 591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Asus GD30CI

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	556x
Core i5-7400Intel $94Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	28x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	200x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	99x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	87x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	48x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	30x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	172x
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 5,600 samples	107x
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 3,066 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16