HP ProLiant ML350 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive9.08% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350 G5  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110502
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 25 '16 at 09:16
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5140
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 49.7
29% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 106
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 147GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.08% Terrible
Read 66.9
Write 67.5
Mixed 59.3
14% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.36
8% 3.93 MB/s
DQ Read 1.88
DQ Write 7.81
DQ Mixed 1.98
2% 3.89 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 105%
Rocket IMAGEFILE 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 68.8
Mixed 51.7
47% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.23
87% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39%
Great: 46%
Scst_bio 1234567890sciaaa 215GB
199GB free
Firmware: 220
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
Read 108
Write 60.6
Mixed 78.5
62% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.42
86% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 62%
Scst_bio 1234567890scibbb 215GB
186GB free
Firmware: 220
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
Read 110
Write 62.3
Mixed 84.5
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.43
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350 G5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback