Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S6  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2619
Memory33.8 GB free of 36 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '18 at 13:20
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 136
56% 90 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 453
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 1,141
71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.41 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 999GB
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.90
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 169
Mixed 131
121% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.53
104% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback