MSI MS-16L4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT63 Titan 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16L4  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '18 at 14:56
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 798
78% 641 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1218) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 121
Parallax 94.4
78% 104 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 92.6
Splatting 102
79% 95.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 899
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,286
311% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 35.3
146% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 54.7
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 140
116% 160 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 206%
Great: 296%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
705GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 117
86% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.15
65% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 23.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16L4 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI MS-16L4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback