HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 839F
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 08:29
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 73.5 1-Core 130 2-Core 260 83% 154 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 1,023 91% 771 Pts	64-Core 1780 110% 1780 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% HP(103C 83CC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	140% Outstanding	Lighting 211 Reflection 184 Parallax 186 172% 194 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 163 Splatting 119 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1,842 Write 1,226 Mixed 1,237 318% 1,435 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 29 98% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 112 135% 238 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 259%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 39154280 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 204 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 322541 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 431 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 167 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1009919105 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 621871138 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 54 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 551 (C2) HDA temperature 34 43 38654705698 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	99.7% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 165 Mixed 179 132% 176 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.22 87% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 802GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 143 143 17197170954 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5741 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7230 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 872 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 9894 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 9894 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 188979085349 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	55.7% Above average	Read 88.7 Write 105 Mixed 89.4 71% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.19 76% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 4x8GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51% Above average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 14.8 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 10.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

System: HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	25x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	21x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	20x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	14x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	5x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 86%, 2,002 samples	10x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBHynixBench 76%, 2,034 samples	9x
RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 4x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 222 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $746

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16