Unknow Unknow

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemUnknow Unknow  (all builds)
Motherboard RS780-SB700
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090210
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 10 '18 at 06:16
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom X3 8650
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 58.1
39% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 71.8
8-Core 73.8
10% 72.8 Pts
64-Core 84.4
5% 84.4 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400
Asus(1043 0510) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.64 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.78
1% 1.04 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.1% Above average
Read 255
Write 189
Mixed 206
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 22.8
85% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 44.8
47% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 133%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 124
Write 136
Mixed 112
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.3
109% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
618GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 89.4
Mixed 88.2
66% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.54
137% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
211GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 68.1
Write 60.1
Mixed 55.1
46% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Unknow Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Unknow Unknow

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback