Novatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemNovatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNovatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '18 at 15:49
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 394
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4982
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 3.44
3% 12.4 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 7.17
4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCC545050A7E630 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA310 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 71.7
Mixed 63.5
51% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.12
52% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M2A2400C16 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Novatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback