| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Boot Drive | 292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180307 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 09 '18 at 12:16 |
| Run Duration | 82 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
96.3%
Outstanding
|
94% 173 Pts
|
103% 873 Pts
|
151% 2,442 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
|
||||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
292%
Outstanding
|
496% 2,216 MB/s
|
223% 87.7 MB/s
|
43% 73.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
121%
Outstanding
|
139% 48.8 GB/s
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
54% 73.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 495x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 261x |
| Core i7-7740XIntel $189Bench 87%, 5,094 samples | 148x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 169x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 151x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $797 |