Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '18 at 04:42
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$654 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 68 1-Core 134 2-Core 259 82% 153 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 1,018 90% 761 Pts	64-Core 2259 140% 2259 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 155 Reflection 180 Parallax 187 126% 174 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 164 Splatting 118 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 1,747 Write 1,347 Mixed 1,268 323% 1,454 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 29.1 188% 76.5 MB/s	DQ Read 543 DQ Write 462 DQ Mixed 198 232% 401 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$79 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 115983760 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1957 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 356830 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1020 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 346 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 59 454426651 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5242 (C2) HDA temperature 27 41 90194313243 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 20096151978178 (F1) Unknown 100 253 858347128 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1006837884	103% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 160 Mixed 172 133% 177 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.21 79% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$79 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 180305048 (03) Spinup time 98 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1808 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 177185 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1019 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 342 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 57 454426651 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4889 (C2) HDA temperature 27 43 90194313243 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 2714419331339 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1142776114 (F2) Unknown 100 253 304045721	102% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 176 Mixed 165 131% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.6% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 16.5 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 10.2 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	500x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	264x
Core i7-7740XIntel $130Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	150x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	153x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	57x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $780

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16