Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory	5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121102
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '16 at 10:29
Run Duration	96 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 82.2 1-Core 53.3 2-Core 76.6 48% 70.7 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 97.9 14% 101 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3223 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.19 2% 1.89 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2OA420 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 222 222 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1356 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 7913 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1262 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 316 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 11101 (C2) HDA temperature 139 139 240518299691 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 29344 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	67% Good	Read 122 Write 112 Mixed 77.9 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.19 65% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11.5 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	65x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	58x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	47x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	163x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	69x
GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	20x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	16x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369