Dell XPS 13 9350

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 13 9350  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09JHRY
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 06 '18 at 15:09
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6560U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Memory 19.1
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 22.1
12% 17.8 Pts
4-Core 32.8
8-Core 33.6
4% 33.2 Pts
64-Core 28.8
2% 28.8 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris 540 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 0704) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4664
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 3.38
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 3.37
Splatting 5.17
3% 4.04 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,205
Write 1,002
Mixed 1,103
246% 1,104 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 9.43
48% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 12.7
12% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 125%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Chip LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.57 GB/s
Latency 327
12% 327 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 13 9350 Builds (Compare 783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 13 9350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback