Acer Aspire 4752

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 4752  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4752
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '18 at 03:48
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Memory 53.6
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 32.6
26% 35 Pts
4-Core 23.6
8-Core 44
4% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 45.8
3% 45.8 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0507) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 0.81
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LX 128GB-$144
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0307A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 486
Write 144
Mixed 227
62% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 10.5
54% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 51.8
DQ Mixed 10.7
15% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate USB 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: 0412
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 25.4
Mixed 26.3
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.23
58% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 99U5428-046.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4752 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback