Lenovo PIWG1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo PIWG1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '16 at 20:02
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Legend(17AA 3976) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.813.3.2000
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.38
5% 6.13 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 6.57
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 490
Write 215
Mixed 304
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 14.8
70% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 58.1
79% 143 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 1078 750GB
265GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 96.4
Write 69.5
Mixed 67.4
95% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.23
77% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 43%
asmedia ASMT1053 750GB
9GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 23
Mixed 18.1
28% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.25
70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PIWG1 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo PIWG1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback