Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '18 at 21:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 628
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2683) 2GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1767 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 54
37% 47.2 fps
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 38.8
39% 45.2 fps
Poor: 29% Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 481
Write 222
Mixed 234
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 16.2
67% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 58.5
74% 139 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
979GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 118
Write 129
Mixed 120
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.19
82% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback