Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '18 at 21:52
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 86.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 253 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 873 83% 686 Pts	64-Core 1,358 84% 1,358 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3716) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Lighting 79.2 Reflection 78.3 Parallax 66.9 64% 74.8 fps	MRender 70.2 Gravity 71.8 Splatting 71.3 58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 228GB 544 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 969 Write 274 Mixed 426 121% 556 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 11.9 112% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 14.9 58% 120 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 119%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 174 3800 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13413 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 7 7 68610 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 692 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 257 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13154 (C2) HDA temperature 108 93 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 107 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 101 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 59	72.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 130 Mixed 124 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.49 138% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 740GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 193 170 1341 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1814 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3674 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 199 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 23 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5461 (C2) HDA temperature 109 101 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	91.4% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 158 Mixed 156 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.28 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.36 136% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 62%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45 23,554 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 267GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 172 2116 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18563 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 42214 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 541 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 201 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 29 29 515240 (C2) HDA temperature 118 95 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.1% Above average	Read 87.2 Write 87.2 Mixed 77.1 63% 83.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.52 124% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 60%
silicon -power 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 14GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.17% Terrible	Read 35.5 Write 5.67 Mixed 0.78 11% 14 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 44% 3.85 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 63.4 MC Mixed 29.4 116% 40.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 10.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	69x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $878

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16