HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 19:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 65
2-Core 137
57% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 431
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.33
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
921GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 156
Mixed 160
123% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.22
84% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 107%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 126
Write 131
Mixed 123
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.42
96% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD Hynix HMT325U7EFR8C-RD Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA Hynix... 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback