Acer Aspire V5-552G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '16 at 13:56
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5757M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 52.9
35% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 82
8-Core 86.5
11% 84.2 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Acer(1025 080E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 6.38
5% 6.74 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 7.87
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk i100 24GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.50.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 324
Write 50.7
Mixed 87.9
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 6.86
4K Mixed 2.21
22% 6.46 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 31%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
192GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 70.2
Mixed 73.2
53% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.17
64% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552G Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback