Asus P7P55D PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '18 at 23:17
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 170 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 394 44% 346 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Lighting 64 Reflection 57.4 Parallax 77 52% 66.1 fps	MRender 57 Gravity 53.1 Splatting 75.3 52% 61.8 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4361 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 474 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 74 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2591 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 61 167504117794 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 10191712884 (F7) Unknown 100 100 318747319 (F8) Unknown 100 100 376767889	39.1% Below average	Read 195 Write 177 Mixed 137 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 13.1 62% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 66.9 DQ Mixed 8.11 17% 33 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 113%
Patriot Blast 120GB 4,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 112GB free Firmware: SAFM12.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2744 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 244 (A8) Unknown 100 100 26475394 (AA) Unknown 100 100 96 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196615 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 13237697 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 434	23.5% Poor	Read 118 Write 82.5 Mixed 84 21% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 6.84 44% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 15.3 DQ Write 33.6 DQ Mixed 5.92 10% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 95%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 56GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 3688518 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 20435454404049 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3144 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 7 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3688518 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3688518 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3688518 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6937 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8170 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8170 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6980	33.7% Below average	Read 197 Write 79.5 Mixed 116 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 9.06 65% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 7.78 18% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 849GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 167 4116 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6728 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10889 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5743 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 122 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6607 (C2) HDA temperature 115 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	64.6% Good	Read 110 Write 115 Mixed 116 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 0.43 117% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D PRO Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D PRO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	106x
Core i5-750Intel $66Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	98x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	104x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	100x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $441

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16