Asus P8Z68-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LE  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '18 at 13:45
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 96.3
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 187
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 362
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1.2GB
CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 2.06
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 510
Write 414
Mixed 419
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 19.9
102% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 18.6
22% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LE Builds (Compare 602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback