Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '18 at 15:22
Run Duration374 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 198
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 359
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
MSI(1462 330C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 113
Parallax 96.4
86% 105 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 99
80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
41GB free
Firmware: 1B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,342
Write 1,204
Mixed 1,332
358% 1,626 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 45.1
249% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 252
278% 474 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 266%
Great: 236%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 375
Write 139
Mixed 160
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 19.8
91% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 35.8
61% 121 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 77%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$88
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 103
Mixed 60.7
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
52GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 74.2
Write 90.7
Mixed 17.1
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.46
88% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 88%
Corsair Flash Voyager GTX USB 3.0 128GB-$107
60GB free, PID 1a0e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 144
Mixed 239
295% 263 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 6.77
744% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 6.57
844% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 135%
Great: 229%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
7GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.9% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 5.88
Mixed 7.44
13% 13 MB/s
4K Read 7.78
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
30% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback