EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 44 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '18 at 12:04
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 813
72% 611 Pts
64-Core 1580
98% 1580 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 72.2
59% 73.6 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 71.6
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
143GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 374
Write 225
Mixed 281
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 22
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 52.2
71% 130 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 91%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 375
Write 174
Mixed 238
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 5.96
62% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 6.37
33% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 187
Mixed 167
136% 181 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.37
103% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 111
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.45
103% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 58%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
173GB free
Firmware: 04.04V03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 104
Write 109
Mixed 94.2
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 0.73
176% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 69%
WD Re 2TB-$35
123GB free
Firmware: 01.01D01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 131
Write 98.2
Mixed 108
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.41
117% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 83%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
93GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 97.4
Mixed 91.9
72% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.68
164% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
26GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 76.6
Write 75.3
Mixed 63.3
54% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.36
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT45... 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.1
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback