| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Biostar H110MH PRO D4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161026 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '18 at 02:15 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.6%
Above average
|
57% 93.6 Pts
|
30% 229 Pts
|
15% 242 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(107D 2771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
26% 29.5 fps
|
25% 31.2 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.9%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
50% 79.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110MH PRO D4 Builds (Compare 191 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H110MH PRO D4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 35x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $67Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 29x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
| HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $157 |