To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '18 at 18:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5700-$22
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 46.6
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 60.8
31% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 59.2
8-Core 46.5
7% 52.8 Pts
64-Core 58.6
4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 78.5
Write 80.3
Mixed 23.1
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.17
41% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.95% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 0.8
SC Mixed 0.1
3% 1 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback