Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 16:45
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$219 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 157 2-Core 307 103% 187 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 837 85% 690 Pts	64-Core 836 52% 836 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 152 Reflection 171 Parallax 136 124% 153 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 177 Splatting 122 116% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 2,219 Write 1,037 Mixed 1,204 326% 1,487 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 34.6 198% 78.2 MB/s	DQ Read 59.9 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 36.4 57% 103 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 236%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 100 100 21474836783 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 112 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 163210395682 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	110% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 187 Mixed 169 138% 184 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.13 90% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 340GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 154 154 21500526945 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 424 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4345 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 389 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 459 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 459 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 210454511651 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	61.8% Good	Read 104 Write 111 Mixed 97.9 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 107%
Innostor Star Ram 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 3GB free, PID 0902 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 115 Write 71.6 Mixed 84.9 109% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.61 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 7% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 27.2 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 26.1 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 51.2 78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,941x
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	774x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	369x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	917x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	789x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	785x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	269x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	269x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	198x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	358x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	290x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	140x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,011

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16