Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '18 at 01:18
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 559
52% 433 Pts
64-Core 733
45% 733 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W7000
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Lighting 9.53
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 12.8
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 13
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple TS512C 500GB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJAA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Average
Read 221
Write 144
Mixed 198
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 15.4
66% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 13.3
22% 41.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-036.A00LF 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 22
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $843
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback