Biostar A770E3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A770E3  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '18 at 23:56
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 102
53% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 202
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
PowerColor(148C 2381) 2GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 30.2
18% 26.8 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 32
23% 27.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 136
Mixed 131
100% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.26
114% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF F3-10666CL9-4GBRL0 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A770E3 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A770E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback