Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '16 at 22:22
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 700
78% 612 Pts
64-Core 702
44% 702 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.0.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 45% Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 249
Write 178
Mixed 160
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 17.3
95% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 46.7
65% 122 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
15GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 497
Write 332
Mixed 338
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 21.4
106% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 53.4
99% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 79.4
Write 120
Mixed 74.6
68% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 7.63
4K Mixed 0.38
204% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 114%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
557GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45% Average
Read 90.9
Write 65.9
Mixed 64
55% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.16
61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
167GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 90.9
Mixed 77.5
64% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.23
92% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 87%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
2GB free
Firmware: FP2A
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 98.4
Mixed 84.9
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.32
109% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback