Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '18 at 01:01
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 946 85% 717 Pts	64-Core 1,310 81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.1 90% 108 fps	MRender 97.9 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4854 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1627 (B1) Unknown 98 98 79 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 117 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18073609781	103% Outstanding	Read 526 Write 496 Mixed 494 113% 505 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 89 4K Mixed 37.5 143% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 91.4 DQ Mixed 22.9 58% 129 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 16GB free Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -104711302663181 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4222 (AB) Unknown 0 0 2 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 158 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 2 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11576 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10536 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10536 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14919	45.6% Average	Read 193 Write 114 Mixed 115 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 11.2 90% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 33.7 49% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 61%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$83 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 173 6208 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8753 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9913 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3407 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 83 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8669 (C2) HDA temperature 126 103 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	70.5% Very good	Read 130 Write 116 Mixed 98.3 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.16 72% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$83 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 178 5866 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3280 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2454 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2774 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1367 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4008 (C2) HDA temperature 126 109 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	63.5% Good	Read 115 Write 106 Mixed 120 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.23 94% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 88%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 70GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 175 8000 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4481 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5550 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1767 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32354 (C2) HDA temperature 126 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.5% Above average	Read 81.1 Write 105 Mixed 106 74% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.23 73% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 87%
Samsung STORY Station 3 1.5TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 768GB free, PID 6053 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 69.9 Write 76.7 Mixed 54.8 86% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.01 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.26 57% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3400 C16 Series 2x8GB 4,679 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 28.6 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 25.8 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	219x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $779

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)