Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 660 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 118 52% 86.1 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 173 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 306A) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.06 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 17 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 14 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 56 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1212993999	50% Average	Read 263 Write 202 Mixed 210 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 14.2 83% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 14.2 25% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KB_4G_D3_1333_C9 2x4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.8 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16