Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370M D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 21:42
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 97.3 1-Core 128 2-Core 253 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 736 77% 618 Pts	64-Core 739 46% 739 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 18.2 16% 17.8 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 20 15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43 7,269 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 201GB free Firmware: M2CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 54 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 903 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 232 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 14 (AE) Unknown 100 100 39 (B4) Unknown 100 100 42 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 4157992265 (F7) Unknown 100 100 36272825 (F8) Unknown 100 100 5492374	93.6% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 385 Mixed 420 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 32.3 118% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 19.5 88% 197 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 114%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,715 Write 1,087 Mixed 1,138 290% 1,313 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 24.2 144% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 53.1 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 141 93% 108 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 485GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 93814024 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1380 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8496589 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1735 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 948 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 34360262683 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 60 45 672792616 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 619 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6560 (C2) HDA temperature 40 55 64424509480 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 197 467 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 43808666419904 (F1) Unknown 100 253 54341423021034 (F2) Unknown 100 253 40492762927436	96.4% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 168 Mixed 146 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.3 85% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 7,238 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 29.7 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 39.7 SC Mixed 30.8 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 49.1 81% 49.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $208Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	269x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	248x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	149x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	120x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	89x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	29x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16