Intel STK1AW32SC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel STK1AW32SC  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '18 at 09:41
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 32.8
21% 30 Pts
4-Core 64.9
8-Core 64.5
9% 64.7 Pts
64-Core 66.2
4% 66.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2066) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 2.03
1% 1.94 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.96
2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4032 31GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.8% Poor
Read 162
Write 99
Mixed 104
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 4.49
29% 9.09 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 4.37
8% 16.5 MB/s
Hitachi HTS545050A7E 500GB
463GB free, PID fc78
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 36.6
Mixed 5.61
31% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.17
19% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HYNIX 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 0.4
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback