Notebook P870DM2_DM3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870DM2_DM3  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870DM2_DM3
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '18 at 12:36
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 241
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 705
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 0873) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.6% Very good
Lighting 93.6
Reflection 119
Parallax 84.6
76% 99.1 fps
MRender 90.2
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 101
77% 93.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 898
Mixed 1,112
291% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 48.7
211% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 184
200% 340 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 216%
Great: 243%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 124
Write 83
Mixed 80
71% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.34
126% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 118
Write 113
Mixed 78
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.34
4K Mixed 0.54
151% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSAT 1TB
9GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
164% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 213
Mixed 218
281% 219 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 12.8
1,404% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 13
1,428% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 27.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870DM2_DM3 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Notebook P870DM2_DM3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback