Asus P8Z77-V LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LK  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '16 at 00:19
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 457
61% 456 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 81.7
Parallax 72.6
64% 77.4 fps
MRender 78.1
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 65.3
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
225GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 265
Write 211
Mixed 218
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 31.5
111% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 110
101% 155 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 134%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 264
Write 160
Mixed 177
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 13
70% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 6.06
24% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
94GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 126
Write 95.6
Mixed 96.6
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.31
99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Vulcan-1600 04EF Vulcan-1600 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LK Builds (Compare 2,193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LK - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback