Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '18 at 01:29
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 248
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 911
85% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,349
84% 1,349 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 3152 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 210
Parallax 190
162% 200 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 196
Splatting 137
127% 157 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 140%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 416
Mixed 421
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 44.4
166% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 23.7
81% 175 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,861
Write 1,612
Mixed 2,018
478% 2,164 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 78.8
265% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 39.5
96% 205 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 308%
Great: 355%
Drobo 5D 17.5TB
8.5TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 208
Write 185
Mixed 111
205% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 5.43
4K Mixed 0.69
213% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 99%
Drobo 5D 2TB
2TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 217
Write 146
Mixed 121
191% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 6.85
4K Mixed 0.41
252% 2.85 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 89%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 17.7
Mixed 22.1
30% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.78
70% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 42.3
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 35.6
103% 36.1 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,099
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback