Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 19 '18 at 04:10
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 272
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 754
82% 648 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.9% Average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 44.4
38% 48.8 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 96.9
66% 79.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT23L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 487
Mixed 499
111% 497 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 35.3
113% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 18.5
106% 242 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
41GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 501
Write 147
Mixed 215
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 11.1
78% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 10.9
29% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 82%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
38GB free
Firmware: M0CR050 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 469
Write 329
Mixed 169
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 6.16
60% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 14
15% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
767GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 189
Mixed 174
140% 187 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.22
94% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
719GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 146
Mixed 143
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.22
98% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
XM1D3LF4GB26826821 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24.4
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 26
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 46.8
85% 46.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 1,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $823
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback